No. 19-8922
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law administrative-proceedings agency-discretion capital-punishment civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities Copyright Privacy
DueProcess Securities Copyright Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Was there sufficient evidence to support her capital murder conviction?
Did the Court of Appeals Err in holding Craker's mistaken belief that she killed her baby
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals erred in denying discretionary review, in violation of the Petitioner's constitutional rights
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-24
Waiver of right of respondent Texas to respond filed.
2020-06-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 7, 2020)
Attorneys
Amber Craker
Frederick Thomas Dunbar — Dunbar Law Firm, Petitioner
Texas