No. 19-8919
Scott Clevenger v. Shawn Phillips, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure custodial-interrogation evidence-suppression miranda-rights right-to-counsel self-incrimination suppression-of-evidence
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Petitioner's self-incriminating statements that was given while he was in custodial interigation without him first being notified of his Miranda rights, violated his right to counsel, against self-incrimination, and should have been suppressed at trial?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner's self-incriminating statements that was given while he was in custodial interigation without him first being notified of his Miranda rights, violated his right to counsel, against self-incrimination, and should have been suppressed at trial?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-13
Waiver of right of respondent Warden Phillips to respond filed.
2020-06-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 7, 2020)
Attorneys
Scott Clevenger
Scott Clevenger — Petitioner
Warden Phillips
Michael M. Stahl — Respondent