Whether prose defendants since file under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and are paid back costs by the Court Judge if in be the onus ce oy tt permission of the applicable Court of Appeals?

Tea ae ym apg et te pl ny Ble sas sn sl A SE.$ 0085 Hac sach iudsmanl as dicected by she rule, OF 18 the ower cour concect - ,I0 Fe chacacterining the motien on the second, sepambe. sudymnant asa _setond Lor succes mati and cali be geukeagte?

Lohether ara aoyuttal io feel hdd te rebucn. ones presumplin of Innecence as to the specific oct of offense Should also be held to demonstrate chual _innecance' of that specific ach or ofilense for the pucpses of AEOMI inca bn

Whether defendants' convictions under 18 U.S.C. 924(c) should be vacated