No. 19-8912
Giezi Arce-Calderon v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process guideline-range guideline-sentence judicial-discretion plea-agreement plea-bargaining sentencing sentencing-guidelines substantive-reasonableness
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
A. Whether the sentence imposed on Mr. Arce is substantively unreasonable, despite being a guideline sentence of six months, where the parties agreed to a lower end of the guideline sentence of zero months.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the sentence imposed on Mr. Arce is substantively unreasonable
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2020)
Attorneys
Giezi Arce-Calderon
Thomas J. Trebilcock-Horan — Trebilcock LLC, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent