No. 19-8906
Nathan Matthew Kinard v. Michael Hoffman, et al.
IFP
Tags: abuse civil-rights commitment-procedures constitutional-rights criminal-procedure custody due-process habeas-corpus individual-liberty mental-health
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Were the witness statements and emails considered?
How many others were tortured into taking a plea while in Escambia County Jails protective custody?
Safety and Mental health was Never investigated, though the Courtroom was made aware of the abuse why?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Dera's testimony and emails should be considered, and whether others were tortured into pleading while in Escombra County jail's protective custody, when the court was aware of the abuse but did not investigate the mental health concerns
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2020)
Attorneys
Nathan Kinard
Nathan Matthew Kinard — Petitioner