No. 19-8902
Rafael Antonio Patino-Villalobos v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: acknowledgement criminal-procedure defense-counsel district-court federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure invited-error legal-doctrine procedural-waiver rule-52(b) sentencing
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether defense counsel's acknowledgement of the district court's statement during sentencing constitutes an affirmative, intentional, deliberate, and/or unambiguous agreement under the invited error doctrine?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether defense counsel's acknowledgement of the district court's statement during sentencing constitutes an affirmative, intentional, deliberate, and/or unambiguous agreement under the invited error doctrine?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 5, 2020)
Attorneys
Rafael Antonio Patino-Villalobos
Valarie Linnen — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent