No. 19-8887
Maria Pena-Rivera v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure district-court evidence-admissibility evidence-admission evidentiary-standard federal-rules-of-evidence judicial-error rule-403 rule-404(b)
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is it error by the district court to fail to enumerate the specific basis for allowing evidence pursuant for Federal Rule of Evidence section 404(b) such that it can properly be analyzed pursuant to the required review under Federal Rule of Evidence 403.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is it error by the district court to fail to enumerate the specific basis for allowing evidence pursuant for Federal Rule of Evidence section 404(b) such that it can properly be analyzed pursuant to the required review under Federal Rule of Evidence 403
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 3, 2020)
Attorneys
Maria Pena-Rivera
Michael L Crowley — Crowley Law Group, APC, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent