I. THERE IS A LACK OF CLARITY AND UNANIMITY AMONG LOWER COURTS OF WHETHER A PRIOR GEORGIA ROBBERY CONVICTION CONSTITUTES A "CRIME OF VIOLENCE" FOR ENHANCEMENT PURPOSES

II. THE ISSUES RAISED ARE IMPORTANT AND WORTHY OF THIS COURT'S ATTENTION BECAUSE OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED DEFENDANT'S AROUND THE COUNTRY HAVE BEEN ENHANCED UNDER 18 U.S.C. §3559 (c) AFTER THE GOVERNMENT EXPLOITED STATEMENTS OF "NON-ELEMENTAL FACTS" IN THE RECORD OF A PRIOR CONVICTION TO INCREASE MAXIMUM STATUTORY PENALTY UNDER 18 U.S.C. §3559 (c)(2)(F), WHEN THE ELEMENT OF THE PRIOR OFFENSE ARE NOT A MATCH WITH THE GENERIC OFFENSE

Whether a prior Georgia robbery conviction constitutes a 'crime of violence' for enhancement purposes