No. 19-8883

Nathan E. Gundy v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure criminal-prosecution due-process eighth-amendment fair-trial judicial-discretion standing trial-rights
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether The 6X Amendment of The United States
Constitution Bids are Guaranteed TO O Farr Thlah
TA alk erimwale ProsecahAs or Gust wheal a Sudge
deems So?

2. Whether The FE Aid Sh Ameudmentts Right to
effect, Ascictauce of Counsel starts bere a Thabo
OF on The day of Trak ?

3. \hether The Eleventh Cireuit+ nsanplied This Courts
Precedenst Ta Johalsonl Rescamps, Auch Mattes wher xd
| Contrash vith Coums ww The Second, Pour RPh, Arid
BM Circuit The Couermments concessiod il Another
© CARE ( Aric cons ton) CASE. Lad Ancl suiry dusty choi,
Tr Concluded 4 Crore bur) 7S Avie As 7D
| The Tipe ob ghachit. clunen! add Teche oh be 4
ve a Aric qualifung pdlerc Felony uate phe
Caer Crim wal Ack ('Aca ?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution bars are guaranteed to a fair trial in all criminal prosecutions or just when a judge deems so?

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-03-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 3, 2020)

Attorneys

Nathan E. Gundy
Nathan E. Gundy — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent