No. 19-8872
James Henry Simpson v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Response WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does 28 U.S.C § 2254 (b)(1) permit a petitioner to waive the state exhaustion requirement if circumstances exist that make the state corrective process ineffective to protect the petitioner's constitutional rights?
2. Is this court's rulings in the cases Redd v. Chappell, 57 U.S. 1041 and Duckworth v. Serrano, 454 U.S. 13, 102 S.Ct 18, 70 L.Ed 2d (981), legally controlling if the chief Justice of a state's supreme court is criminally complicit?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on excessive fines applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-24
Waiver of right of respondent Harold Clarke to respond filed.
2020-06-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 31, 2020)
Attorneys
Harold Clarke
Toby Jay Heytens — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Henry James Simpson
James Simpson — Petitioner