Question Presented (from Petition)
OR weoNg thAt thE Fouet ciRlunt (ouet of AppEAb Afteming thE ctenal of A GEetificatE sf Arprelatility By the Jstect (ouet wher :
A) EVEEy CASE HHAT HHE PERTONER'S MOTON wAS STANEd tO. AWANT A dECISIONL ON WAS GRANTE
2) WEHER REASONAb IRSS COU FINd TEbATAblF OR weeNg thet tht Faeth Cikut cokt of ApiAl's AFFIRMANICE of HHE dENIAL b thE DSTRIC CORH, DENIEC Appellent An oppoetunity to bE EARd whEN:
A PEtICNER'S POtON WAS dISMSSEd L REFERENCE O A CHARGE HHEL WAS CSMSSED VIA PEA AUREMENHT ANd thAt pEtITIOMER wAD NEVEe FOUNd qUilty o
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on excessive fines applies to the states
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Xavier Lymas
Xavier Deshawn Lymas — Petitioner