No. 19-8846
David Nowakowski v. Pennsylvania
IFP
Tags: criminal-network criminal-organizations criminal-procedure district-attorney inchoate-crimes organized-crime prosecutorial-discretion racketeering
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Where a private criminal plaintiff is ignored by a local District Attorney's Office, in the presence of criminality from racketeering, inchoate crimes, criminal organizations, and organized crime, is the District Attorney's discretion disproved by continued and worsening operation of the criminal network at issue.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Where a private criminal plaintiff is ignored by a local District Attorney's Office, in the presence of criminality from racketeering, inchoate crimes, criminal organizations, and organized crime, is the District Attorney's discretion disproved by continued and worsening operation of the criminal network at issue
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 3, 2020)
Attorneys
David Nowakowski
David Nowakowski — Petitioner