No. 19-8839
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-material brady-v-maryland criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel missouri-v-frye newly-discovered-evidence plea-bargaining plea-offer public-records-request
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does a public records request meet the criteria to establish a newly discovered evidence claim as Brady v. Maryland 1, does; especially when the information found is that of a favorable plea offer with an attached deadline that was never relayed by counsel to defendant, as announced in Missouri v. Frye 2?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a public records request meet the criteria to establish a newly discovered evidence claim as Brady v. Maryland does; especially when the information found is that of a favorable plea offer with an attached deadline that was never relayed by counsel to defendant, as announced in Missouri v. Frye?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-10
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2020-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 27, 2020)
Attorneys
Clayton D. Morrow
Clayton D. Morrow — Petitioner
Florida