SHOULDENT A COURT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS ABUSE OF DESCRETION WHEN IT FAILS TO
FOLLOW THE RULE OF LAW AS IT IS WRITTEN???

SHOULDENT A RULE OF LAW BE INTERPRETED AS WRITTEN,BY ALL COURTS IN THE NATION?)

SHOULDENT THE LANGUAGE OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL. PRQCEEDURES 41(g) BE
PROPERLY APPLICABLE TO "ANY PERSONS AGGREIVED" AS IT IS WRITTEN, - ; .
RATHER THAN ONLY TO PERSONS PROCEEDING IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AS BOTH LOWER COURTS
HAS HELD TO DENY PETITIONER THE RETURN OF HER VEHICLE???

SHOULDENT A PETITIONER PROCEEDING IN PRO PER BE GIVEN THE BENEFIT OF ALL DOUBT ALONG
WITH TO BE EXCUSED FROM ALL TECHNICAL PROCEEDURAL MATTERS?

Should courts be held responsible for abuse of discretion when failing to follow the rule of law as written?