WHETHER A NEW INTERVENING JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE RESTARTS THE ONE YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR HABEAS CORPUS PETITIONS FILED BY STATE PRISONERS?

WHETHER PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO EQUAL PROTECTION AND DUE PROCESS GUARANTEED BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT WAS VIOLATED WHEN THE PRINCIPLE THAT SIMILARLY SITUATED DEFENDANTS MUST BE TREATED THE SAME?

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures