No. 19-8805

Shane Bruce v. Great Britain, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-06-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights class-action constitutional-animus district-conspiracy due-process equal-protection foreign-litigation industrial-poisoning medical-malpractice pro-per-amendment standing toxic-torts
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

Are victims of industrial poisoning persecuted as a group with grounds for claims a subclass facing Unconstitutional animus?

Is litigation against foreign entities found criminal in harming the populace applicable under JASTA (Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act)?

Does District-wide conspiracy negate medical malpractice pre-trial requirements of 'good-faith' certificates or notification?

Is IFP screening or abuses thereof Unconstitutional?

Does the District Court have to follow fair and unbiased expected procedures based on precedent of facts and logical argument?

Does the District Court have to maintain its Jurisdiction as a duty?

Whether factual error and preserved error is immune from plain error review?

Can Orders only cite precedents which conflict with their decisions?

Are Pro Per allowed to amend Complaint in perceived errors of form?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Are victims of industrial poisoning persecuted as a group with grounds for claims a subclass facing Unconstitutional animus?

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-27
Reply of petitioner Shane Bruce filed. (Distributed)
Main DocumentProof of Service
2020-08-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-05
Waiver of right of respondent The University of Tennessee Medical Center to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-07-24
Waiver of right of respondent American Medical Association: (Case not appealed as to AMA) to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-07-23
Brief of respondent Christian Terzian, M.D., Jeffrey Nitz, PA, Tennova Cardiology, Tennova LaFollette Medical Center Clinic, LaFollette Medical Center of Tennova Healthcare in opposition filed.
Main DocumentProof of Service
2020-07-16
Waiver of right of respondents United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-07-09
Waiver of right of respondents Stephen Teague, MD., et al. to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-07-02
Waiver of right of respondent Gregory Finch to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-07-02
Waiver of right of respondent American Association of Poison Control Centers to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-06-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 24, 2020)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count

Attorneys

American Association of Poison Control Centers
Steven Douglas Parman — Watkinsd & McNeilly, PLLC, Respondent
American Medical Association: (Case not appealed as to AMA)
David L. Steed — Cornelius & Collins, LLP, Respondent
Christian Terzian, M.D., Jeffrey Nitz, PA, Tennova Cardiology, Tennova LaFollette Medical Center Clinic, LaFollette Medical Center of Tennova Healthcare
C. J. Gideon Jr. — Gideon, Essary, Tardio & Carter, PLC, Respondent
Gregory Finch
R. Scott Durham — London & Amburn, P.C., Respondent
Shane Bruce
Shane Bruce — Petitioner
Stephen Teague, MD., et al.
Joshua J. Bond — Hodges Doughty Carson, PLLC, Respondent
The University of Tennessee Medical Center
Stephen Carroll Daves — O'Neil, Parker, Williamson, Respondent
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent