Rafeeq Salahuddin v. David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess HabeasCorpus
whether a state count of last resort has power to destroy a
dependant's constitutional vight to trial by jury whosemember's
are selected by non-discriminatory criterid pursuant to a newly
applicable to a
yet final, without first affording
defendants whose cases were not
him notice, and an adequate opportunity to protect it?
Whether a state defendant has a due process and equal protection
of the laws right to beredit from the protection of a newly declared
Constitutiondl Rule(Batson Rule) when his case was pending on
direct appeal as of right when the Constitutional Rule ( Batson Rule)
was announced bythis Court?
Whether a state defendant that has timely and properly filed
a claim of a constitutional Batson viclation on dttect appel
right, have a due process and equal protection of the laws right to
Whether a State Court of last resort has power to destroy a defendant's Constitutional right to trial by jury whose members are selected by non-discriminatory criteria pursuant to a newly declared Constitutional Rule (Batson Rule), made retroactively applicable to all similarly situated state and federal criminal defendants whose cases were not yet final, without providing him notice, and an adequate opportunity to protect his rights?