No. 19-8797

Theodore C. Shove v. Captain McDonald, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-06-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process perjury standing statutory-duty
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Do U S Courts review pro se filings by a different standard of Review Than that of a professional Attorney, especially in Reviewing of Evidence, and Complaint presenting complaint?

2. If a U.S- Citizen has a "Statutory Duty 1* to Report A Grime to U.S. Courts, ('Title 18 U-S.C. §04) , Does U.S Court have an Invoked, Duty to implement corrections, pursuant to (28 U S C- §453) ?

3. A "Criminal Standard of Practice' ' Adjudicated by U.S- Court By Those Vested with Authority, Create an Invoked Duty to U S Courts, especially if criminal standard of practice is foundation to Violate U S. Constitutional Guaranteed Rights of U S Citizens?

4. If A U S Court is presented with Documents which by their contents certify perjury, fraud, that were presented to Court to influence judicial proceeding, and now Noticed by opposition of criminal violations, doesn't This trigger Invoked Duty upon U S Court, pursuant to (28 U S C. §453) ?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do U.S. courts review pro se filings by a different standard of review than that of a professional attorney, especially in reviewing of evidence and complaint presenting?

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2020-07-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-29
Waiver of right of respondent McDonald, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
2020-06-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 24, 2020)

Attorneys

McDonald, Warden, et al.
Jeffrey Thomas FisherCalifornia Department of Justice, Respondent
Theodore C. Shove
Theodore Shove — Petitioner