No. 19-8779
Nader Salem Elhuzayel v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: due-process electronic-surveillance ex-parte-proceedings ex-parte-review fifth-amendment fisa in-camera-review sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Privacy
DueProcess FifthAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the district court's in camera, ex parte review of the materials, application, and surveillance order without permitting disclosure or participation by defense counsel violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the assistance of counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court's in camera, ex parte review of the materials, application, and surveillance order without permitting disclosure or participation by defense counsel violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the assistance of counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2020)
Attorneys
Nader Elhuzayel
Guy Michael Tanaka — Law Office of Michael Tanaka, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent