No. 19-8762
Percy St. George v. Kevin Ransom, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, et al.
IFP
Tags: circuit-court-review civil-rights due-process equitable-tolling extraordinary-circumstances habeas-corpus judicial-discretion procedural-timeliness statute-of-limitations statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER REASONABLE JURIST COULV DEBATE THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEALS ADOPTION THAT THE DISTRICT COURT'S RULING THAT
APPELLANT'S PETITION WAS UNTIMELY SEE 28 U.S.C. §§2244(d) (1) &I.
5 2253 (c) , AND ALSO HAS NOT ARGUABLY DEMONSTRATED ANY BASIS FOR
EQUITABLE TOLLING BECAUSE HE HAS NOT SHOWN "THAT HE HAS BEEN
. THAT SOME EXTRAORDINARY /PURSUING HIS RIGHTS DILIGENTLY AND • •X
CIRCUMSTANCE ON THE BASIS OF Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631,/
649 (2010)" CONTRARY TO Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-reasonable-jurist-could-debate-third-circuit-court-of-appeals-adoption
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-05-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2020)
Attorneys
Percy St. George
Percy St. George — Petitioner