No. 19-8753
Frederick H. Banks v. United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Response WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the "Ordain and Establish" Clause in the Preamble to U.S. House of Representatives to Review petitioner's Articles of Impeachment?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Adam and Gebhss' Clause in the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution gave Petitioner standing to compel the U.S. House of Representatives to review the treaty/Articles of the public domain?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2020-07-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 20, 2020)
Attorneys
Frederick H. Banks
Frederick H. Banks — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent