No. 19-8749

Paul Anthony Crayton v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-06-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-law cell-phone-data civil-rights constitutional-law fourth-amendment fourth-amendment-jurisprudence judicial-review legal-procedure privacy reasonable-expectation-of-privacy search-and-seizure statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2020-12-04 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

was the pirosented Statement made in the Newspaper hommbul evoug to wannt a mistial?

2 D (cRaytaw) Anmendent. Presene his 6tll N3) boovove Dio the Desponserr in the preseree dr the bentue Uenie Sonel vielate (Chaytene) Conat. Riste?

Did the twiel Judqe a buse hen dieneten bay using Vrenire Ponel prom the the Jene venice senbe trer thengh they oven hene the antde in tho sews paper? Vate Catens Cont. Rite (o Annd)?

Dees the State Prssentor after the baut Coming and admitiry She "snisspoke" in the newspeper anttale (Chatno) Rilt to a faig tRil?

Jiolate tho til (Cayton) receive 6aire and By Law was 2 iSate.0

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the government's warrantless search and seizure of a person's cell phone location data violates the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures

Docket Entries

2020-12-07
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-10-28
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 20, 2020)

Attorneys

Paul Anthony Crayton
Paul Anthony Crayton — Petitioner