DID THE STATE OF MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT DENY MR. GLENN THE EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE STATE AND FEDERAL CONSTITUTION WHEN IT RUBBER-STAMPED MR. GLENN'S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL DUE TO WARRANTLESS ACCESSING OF CELL PHONE RECORDS PURSUANT TO FEDERAL STATUTE (1. WAS SEARCH UNDER FEDERAL CONSTITUTION'S FOURTH AMENDMENT? AND (2. VIOLATED FOURTH AMENDMENT BECAUSE SHOWING REQUIRED UNDER STATUTE FELL SHORT OF PROBABLE CAUSE REQUIRED FOR WARRANT. THEREBY, DENYING HIM A MEANINGFUL REVIEW OF HIS APPEAL WHERE THE CASE WAS DENIED IN UNPRECEDENTED RECORD TIME.

Did the State of Michigan Supreme Court deny Glenn the equal protection under the state and federal constitution when it rubber-stamped Dr. Glenn's application for leave to appeal due to warrantless accessing of cell phone records pursuant to federal statute?