No. 19-8696

Frank DiTomasso v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2020-06-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial free-speech ineffective-counsel prosecutorial-misconduct sentencing standing
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

,and there is not even an attempt to
sked for,e.g.pictures or video,
2
get any picturer or videos?
.There is a bold lie Tald to the grand jury in first in dictment
how can that indictment stand?
.Marcus clearlty hed the means and oppertunity to engage in.
such conduct and war the only one who could. Even after admitting

With all the errors done be defense counsel, between having
no
lefense(which there was a defenre), hot call ing the person responsib
this
not
the stand, his opening statement, ete..how is
completely ineffectivee assis tance of counsel?
How can DiTomasso be held responsible for his attorneys mistakes
eg."DiTomasso made no effort to develop a record in dirtrict court
that NcnEl violated his Fourt Amendment Rights, and that no
judge.)
How can file sharing retworks that are know to have almost all
How can DiTomasso be held accountable for testimony when he
clearly had no prep what so ever?

con the trial be fair when the prosecution began
things in opening statemen+ that were completely
e?
the trial be fair when the defense tells the jury
6an
e judge refused to call a mistrial because she was
to retireing, How is this acceptable?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether there was a conviction of production of child pornography when nothing was ever asked for, such as pictures or video, and there was not even an attempt to get any pictures or videos

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-01-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 20, 2020)

Attorneys

Frank DiTomasso
Frank DiTomasso — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent