No. 19-8675
Issac Oral Chandler v. United States
Tags: constitutional-challenge criminal-sentencing due-process fifth-amendment jury-trial reasonable-doubt revocation sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation supervised-release
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Should this Court grant review to determine whether the mandatory provision for revocation of supervised release set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g) violates the Fifth and Sixth Amendments by requiring revocation and a term of imprisonment without affording a defendant the right to proof to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should this Court grant review to determine whether the mandatory provision for revocation of supervised release set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g) violates the Fifth and Sixth Amendments by requiring revocation and a term of imprisonment without affording a defendant the right to proof to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Issac Oral Chandler
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent