1. Whether it is "misprision of treason " that eight Justices remained silent of
Chief Justice Roberts ' conflict of interest against inventors as a member of the
Knights of Malta with fealty to the Queen of England who controls SERCO and
QinetiQ Group Pic, both British companies, in services that prejudice the
inventor 's patent properties.

2. Whether an impartial Supreme Court still exists to rule on any inventor 's
cases, after Chief Justice Roberts recused due to his conflict of interest as a
member in the Knights of Malta and eight Justices remained silent on Chief
Justice Roberts ' membership in that foreign organization, and failed to enforce
Chief Justice Marshall 's Mandated Prohibition from repudiating Government-
issued Patent Contract Grants in Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U.S. 87 (1810); Trustees
of Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 17 U.S. 518 (1819); Grant v. Raymond, 31
U.S. 218 (1832); U.S. v. American Bell Telephone Company, 167 U.S. 224 (1897)
— Governing Supreme Court Precedents — the Supreme Law of the Land.

3. Whether this Case and all of Petitioner 's/inventor 's Cases, which are all
predicated upon the Court failing to enforce Chief Justice Marshall 's Mandated
Prohibition from repudiating Government-issued Patent Contract Grants in
Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U.S. 87 (1810); Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward,
17 U.S. 518 (1819); Grant v. Raymond, 31 U.S. 218 (1832); U.S. v. American
Bell Telephone Company, 167 U.S. 224 (1897) — Governing Supreme Court
Precedents — the Supreme Law of the Land, must be referred to the President
to ensure the inventor 'sright to Constitutional redress, to void all
unconstitutional Orders and restore the inventor 's patents to their original
pristine condition.

4. Whether Chief Justice Roberts must leave the bench for breach of public trust,
from his financial conflict of interest by his wife placing attorneys at large law
firms such as opposing counsel Winston and Strawn and Greenberg Traurig
and large Corporations such as IBM, Microsoft, and breach of solemn oath of
office in not enforcing Chief Justice J. Marshall 's Mandated Prohibition from
repudiating Government-issued Patent Contract Grants declared in Fletcher
v. Peck, 10 U.S. 87 (1810); and affirmed in Trustees of Dartmouth College v.
Woodward, 17 U.S. 518 (1819); Grant v. Raymond, 31 U.S. 218 (1832); U.S. v.
American Bell Telephone Company, 167 U.S. 224 (1897).

5. Whether this Court making it expensive, hazardous and burdensome to have
access to the Court for raising Chief Justice Roberts ' foreign loyalty and
financial conflicts of interests, with the Court providing no evidence that those
valid questions were "frivolous and/or malicious " constitutes "misprision of
treason

Whether Chief Justice Roberts' conflict of interest as a member of the Knights of Malta prejudices inventors' patent rights