No. 19-8650
Sebastian Albert Campbell v. Maryland
Response RequestedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure defense-tools due-process fair-trial legal-standard right-to-counsel self-representation trial-fairness
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-04-30
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the state of Maryland err by utilizing an improper legal standard in its determination that compelling Petitioner to relinquish his right to self-representation in order to assert his right to be provided with the basic tools of an adequate defense did not deprive him of a fair trial?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the state of Maryland err by utilizing an improper legal standard in its determination that compelling Petitioner to relinquish his right to self-representation in order to assert his right to be provided with the basic tools of an adequate defense did not deprive him of a fair trial?
Docket Entries
2021-05-03
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2021-01-28
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-22
Reply of petitioner Sebastian Albert Campbell filed.
2020-11-13
Brief of respondent Maryland in opposition filed.
2020-08-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 13, 2020.
2020-08-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 14, 2020 to November 13, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-08-13
Response Requested. (Due September 14, 2020)
2020-07-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-05-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 9, 2020)
Attorneys
Maryland
Carrie J. Williams — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Sebastian Albert Campbell
Sebastian Albert Campbell — Petitioner