FOR REVIEW , THE PARKINSON DISEASED SOMETIME PRODUCE THE SEQUEL ; DR THE SEQUEL PARKINSONISM PRODUCE PARKINSON DISEASE JSRQNG.

• %/Zim NUMBER ESU.UE • .THAT _ X PRISENTTED^PO rJiIYIEW -ISA INJURE^ j£43®&
'WORSENEDJ^QJEgD. ■ SHAa 'SANGHO CLAIMED HE HAD PARKINSON'S T.TTCK SYMPTOMS)
'M^AmiMSQIflM^ teEK-WILL-PPGDOOE W ^S35AS 1:' -BECAUSE IT IS, AH~SEQUEL *\
£3*F SYMPTOMS IS rAtvKlNs.QNISM"-OR( PARKINSONISM PLUS jERQDUCE . in AT IS. PLACED THE OXCART ON FRONT o£ THE OX (THE WAGON IN THE HEAD OF
13®S82S

#TWO TRITC FOR REVTKWt THE PANEL ALSO DECIDES WHETHERTOCERTIFY THE OPINION FOR'
PUBLICATION.INGENERAL AN OPINION IS PUBLISHED IF IT ESTABLISHES ANEW RULE
OF LAW INVOLVES A LEGALISSUE OF OF CONTINUING PUBLIC INTEREST CRITICIZES
EXISTING LAW OR MAKES A SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION TO LEGAL LITERATURE.
UNPUBLISHED OPINION DO NOT ESTABLISH PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORS?
TO SUPPORT AN ARGUMENT NOT BY PARTY NOT BY THE COURT.

CALIFORNIA COURT CEL. APPEAL SIXTH APPELLATE DISTTRICT INSAN JOSE.
, i OF CIVIL PROCEDURE# #3$&OEXiSTING DISABILITIES
■Ak^xS^£... Lilkz'MTItefi f- > ££ftIOD?I$ ?OQRRSCT? . ' . . - ,
•JOUR _xsuii£ FOR REVIEW* all TiffiTSAMAGES Harm AND NOW THE IN JURY PARKINSON, 3
..:DISEASE 0 £KARS OFT'ARKINSONISM REHABILIT AC ION WITH PHICAL THERAPEUTIST
TRAUMATOLOGIST. AND TREATMEN2 ':OF THE BEST NEUROLOGIST OF 0? BORN -COUNTRY
^GAN"BE A PRODUCT OF FEW HOURS OF ONE NIGHT AND FEW HOURS THE NEXT DAY?.

# FIVE ISUUE FOR REVIEW ./?IS CQRRE CT
DOCUMENTS OF ONE PARTY IN favor op mm amm*
THERE PRECISELY tonore T-PARKINSON
TO CUT JUDICIOUS LITTLE PIECES OF
STTT.T. .SONS*.-!' PARTY. Aim THAT TS

# SIX ISUUE FOR REVIEW. I DID KNOW THAT IN IN CRIMINAL CASES THE
COURT OR THE DEFENDANTS ARE ABLE TO BRING BACK OLD CASES AS PREVIOUS
BUT MY TREE CASES ARE CIVIL ? IS CORRECT WHAT THEY DID?
I AM THE PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT $ THE FIRST CASE ^ ^Qm Q&m ^ ^ ^

Whether the panel correctly decided that Parkinsonism does not produce Parkinson's disease