A. WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED BY DENYING MR. HALL'S MERITORIOUS ARGUMENT THAT THE DISTRICT COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN DENYING MR. HALL'S MOTION FOR A NEW ATTORNEY.

B. WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED BY DENYING MR. HALL'S MERITORIOUS ARGUMENT THAT THE DISTRICT COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR BY IMPOSING A SENTENCE BASED ON DRUG WEIGHT WHICH INACCURATELY OVERSTATED MR. HALL'S CRIMINAL INVOLVEMENT.

Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying the defendant's arguments