Timothy A. Marr v. Joshua E. Doyle
DueProcess
WHETHER FLORIDA'S CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT CAN PROVIDE AND EXCEPTION TO PERMIT FRAUD ON OR BY JUDGES AND OFFICERS OF A STATE'S COURTS.
WHETHER THE FLORIDA BAR OF FLORIDA VIOLATES ITS CONSTITUTIONAL OATH OF OFFICE TO SUPPORT, PROTECT, AND DEFEND THE PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES, THAT IDENTIFIES UNDER THE PENALTY ON PERJURY, AND TO CULTURAL TRADITIONS OF HONESTY AND INTEGRITY BY WITHHOLDING RELIEF FROM FRAUD, PERPETRATED ON AND BY THE STATE'S COURTS.
WHETHER THE FLORIDA BAR VIOLATES ITS CONSTITUTIONAL OATH OF OFFICE BY DISMISSING THE PETITIONER'S COMPLAINT THAT SHOWED FLORIDA BAR STAFF COUNSEL, ACCEPTED THE RESPONSE TO A COMPLAINT, AS A STATEMENT OF FACTS, IS UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY. IN CLEAR VIOLATION OF THE PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS.
Whether Florida's Code of Judicial Conduct permits fraud on or by judges and officers of a state's courts