No. 19-8590

Timothy A. Marr v. Joshua E. Doyle

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2020-06-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-oath due-process equal-protection fraud fraud-allegations judicial-conduct oath-of-office petition-rights right-to-petition
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

WHETHER FLORIDA'S CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT CAN PROVIDE AND EXCEPTION TO PERMIT FRAUD ON OR BY JUDGES AND OFFICERS OF A STATE'S COURTS.

WHETHER THE FLORIDA BAR OF FLORIDA VIOLATES ITS CONSTITUTIONAL OATH OF OFFICE TO SUPPORT, PROTECT, AND DEFEND THE PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES, THAT IDENTIFIES UNDER THE PENALTY ON PERJURY, AND TO CULTURAL TRADITIONS OF HONESTY AND INTEGRITY BY WITHHOLDING RELIEF FROM FRAUD, PERPETRATED ON AND BY THE STATE'S COURTS.

WHETHER THE FLORIDA BAR VIOLATES ITS CONSTITUTIONAL OATH OF OFFICE BY DISMISSING THE PETITIONER'S COMPLAINT THAT SHOWED FLORIDA BAR STAFF COUNSEL, ACCEPTED THE RESPONSE TO A COMPLAINT, AS A STATEMENT OF FACTS, IS UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY. IN CLEAR VIOLATION OF THE PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Florida's Code of Judicial Conduct permits fraud on or by judges and officers of a state's courts

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-05-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 2, 2020)

Attorneys

Timothy Marr
Timothy Alan Marr — Petitioner