No. 19-8589
Ramon Enrique Acosta v. United States
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review plea-bargaining sixth-amendment trial-counsel
Latest Conference:
2020-06-25
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether reasonable jurists could debate the district court's determination that trial counsel was not constitutionally ineffective with respect to the government's plea offer.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether reasonable jurists could debate the district court's determination that trial counsel was not constitutionally ineffective with respect to the government's plea offer
Docket Entries
2020-06-29
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.
2020-06-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-05-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 2, 2020)
Attorneys
Ramon Enrique Acosta
Janice L. Bergmann — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent