Whether the Ninth Circuit's low burden of proof for possession of a firearm in cohabitation cases extends the scope of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) beyond its purpose, violates Due Process and chills the exercise of Second Amendment rights of law-abiding individuals to keep and bear arms in defense of hearth and home. See Henderson v. United States, 575 U.S. 622 (2015); In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970); District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008).

Whether the Ninth Circuit's low burden of proof for possession of a firearm in cohabitation cases extends the scope of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) beyond its purpose, violates Due Process and chills the exercise of Second Amendment rights of law-abiding individuals to keep and bear arms in defense of hearth and home