No. 19-8543
Carl L. Burdick v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3553 advisory-guidelines criminal-procedure judicial-discretion plea-agreement rita-v-united-states sentencing sentencing-guidelines sentencing-range united-states-v-booker
Latest Conference:
2020-06-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the District Court, contrary to precedents of this Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, accorded the advisory sentencing guidelines range a presumption of reasonableness?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court accorded the advisory sentencing guidelines a presumption of reasonableness
Docket Entries
2020-06-22
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.
2020-06-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-05-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 26, 2020)
Attorneys
Carl Burdick
Martin John Vogelbaum — Federal Public Defender's Office - WDNY, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent