No. 19-8533

Michael A. Lajeunesse v. Megan Anne Chambers, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-05-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: brady-violation civil-rights civil-rights-statute constitutional-rights due-process evidence exculpatory-evidence judicial-notice prosecutorial-misconduct section-1983 standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. WHETHER OR NOT I CAN PETITION THE COURT FOR RELIEF
AND OR AN INJUNCTION UNDER OUR CIVIL RIGHTS STATUTE TITLE 42
USCS § 1983, 1985, OR 1986 WHEN THE PROSECUTOR, COUNTY MEDICAL
EXAMINER, AND MY DEFENSE ATTORNEY CONSPIRED TOGETHER THROUGH
USE OF PERJURY AS A [W]EAP0N' WHERE THEY HAD PURPOSEFULLY THE
WITHHELD "EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE" BY FAILING TO ADMIT THE SAID
EVIDENCE AS AN EXHIBIT?

2. IS THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND IT'S AMENDMENTS
A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT AND THE PEOPLE CAPABLE OF BEING
INFORCED THROUGH EQUITY AND LAW — AND/OR THROUGH A BREACH OF
CONTRACT "RIGHTS?"

3. HOW COME I COULDN"T HAVE TOOKEN JUDICIAL NOTICE OF
MY STATE-COURT PROCEEDINGS WHERE THE JUDGE WENT AGAINST THE LAW
DOCTRINE OF RES JUDICATA AND^ISSUE PRECLUSION IMMEDIATELY IN THE
FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT CALIMING THAT MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
WERE VIOLA TED AND WHERE I REPEADELY PETITIONED THE SUPREME COURT
■FOR RELIEF?/

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner can seek relief under 42 USC §1983, 1985, or 1986 for alleged conspiracy to withhold exculpatory evidence

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-03-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 22, 2020)

Attorneys

Michael Lajeunesse
Michael Alexander LaJeunesse — Petitioner