1. Does the Disability to Shoulder Concrete Financial Loss Demonstrate a Lack of Standing When Bringing 2 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) Act claim, Arising Out of Mail and/or Wire Fraud?

2. Does the Doctrine That a District Court Must Decline Exercising Supplemental Jurisdiction Over a Prisoner's State Law Claim When Federal Claims Have Been Dismissed Violate the Eleventh Amendment Proscription Against the Violation of Excessive Fineness?

3. Does the Doctrine That a District Court Must Decline Exercising Supplemental Jurisdiction Over a Prisoner's State Law Claims When Federal Claims Have Been Dismissed Substantially Comport with the Courts Prior Instruction That Such a Decision Should Be Based on the "Values of Judicial Comity"?

4. Is a District Court's Dismissal of a Pro Se Plaintiff's Complaint at the Screening Phase for Failure to State a Claim Without Leave to Amend a Substantial Departure from the Court's Decision in Mattel, Millinery, W.D. U.S. 4W, 2aq, 10fl S.Ct. 1Mnrw^D? (or Rule 15(a) (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure?)

5. What is the Appropriate Remedy for a District Court's Resolution of Material Facts at the Pleading Stage.

Does the inability to show concrete financial loss deprive a plaintiff of standing when bringing a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act claim arising from mail and/or wire fraud?