No. 19-8524
Gregory Preston Coker, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2020-06-25
Question Presented (from Petition)
i) Uirrht* -rle ^ m^pUr? sf o\
JnO rt+ Ctefr/io'iMeo +£? s'c
CAacca ^vi U.S
M-si'iis Di^ ibie + a Q*,UFal*'*i
6F(oJ0&- Pnwiok 7
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 4th Circuit misapplied the standard in Madisyn vs. Whed to determine if the SIC Code 474-53-375 is applicable to a Qualified Affordable Defendant Predicate (i)
Docket Entries
2020-06-29
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.
2020-06-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-05-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 22, 2020)
Attorneys
Gregory Preston Coker
Gregory Preston Coker Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent