Did the Massachusetts Appeals Court deny a defendant due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, when it retroactively applied two decisions that abolished the state's previously "expressed" and widely relied upon "common law" rule prohibiting application of the procedural waiver doctrine when addressing a specific type of structural error, Rogers v. Tennessee, 532 U.S. 451, 461-462 (2001)?

Did the Massachusetts Appeals Court deny a defendant due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment