Petitioners appeal Without him compusorry process to Call a Witness in his Fabor as guarented in the 6th AMendment of the Constitution and to determine Whr trial Counser Failed to Investigate, Subpoena and Obtain Newson's text Messoge records to use as exculpatory evidence and rebut the States theory to Call Wltness Angel Newson in his Favor? Trian Counser Failed to call a pytatite Witress as requested br Petitloner to Support his testimony Counsel br Faiing to investigte Subpona and abtain Newson

1.IS Petitioner Newson ISsues 182 of Inettective assistance of Counse Falliny Call Wtness and Falling to Obtaln text Mese recods Substanlal Does a persons aiming Self-detense Where as the State Failed to prove a Prima acle Case of Second degree Murder?

6). Does Tria Counser Violate's Pettioners Sth, 6t&14th AMendMent Consutional Rg of a Funciong Cone Reqing the inapplicable Stand Your Ground Jury instructions due to Lack of understanding of the Law? Does this deem triar Counsel inetfective?

With Jurr instructions On Heat of Posslon Which Was applicable to the Facts and Circumstances of Petitiores Cose? Does this Constitute Violation of Petitioner NeWSon's 5th, 6th, AND 14th A and a Functloning Counse?

Whether the petitioner was denied due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment by the state court's refusal to compel the production of exculpatory evidence and allow the petitioner to present a complete defense