I -DID DEFENDANT VIOLATE PLAINTIFF'S RIANTS UNDEL THE FOURTH TIOKETS UNDER COCOR OF LAW AND COST PEAINTIFF TWO SEPARATE ARRESTS

2-DD ERENDANT DEPRIVE PEANTIRF'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIAHTS BY IGNDRING PEANTIFF'S ADUISE OF THE REMDUAL OF NABITUAL OFFENDER, SECOND LIFATION TCKET ATED JANUARY 27, 2OI7 THAT 17 WAS. PLANTIRF A SELOND ARREST?

4-DID PEANTIFF MAUE LEGAL PROBLEOS ON PROPERLY UTIGATING HIS CASE AT SOmE POINT TAAT PEANTFF NEDED APPOINTED COUNSEL AND WAS DENIED SEVERAL TIMES?

5-DA DEFENDANT VIOLATE PLANTIRF'S ELGHTH AMENDMENT AND EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE − OF THE L UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIEN THAT PEAINTIRE. DESERVES MONETARY DAMAGES BASED ON PEMNTIFF'S COMPLAINT?

Whether the defendant violated the plaintiff's constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment and Equal Protection Clause