Does the void-for-vagueness doctrine extend to cases such as Derrico's where courts have rested on the authority of judges and juries to ratify arbitrary enforcement? In the decision below, the Supreme Court of Georgia wholly ignores arbitrary enforcement because it concludes that the evidence was sufficient to convict Derrico. The problem is that the evidence is also sufficient to convict the victim who was not prosecuted, on each of the same charges.

Does the void-for-vagueness doctrine extend to cases where courts have rested on the authority of judges and juries to ratify arbitrary enforcement?