No. 19-8481

Ronald D. Veteto v. Dewayne Estes, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Alabama
Docketed: 2020-05-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts appointment-of-counsel civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process equal-protection judicial-review legal-procedure standing statutory-provisions
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the trial judge violate Petitioner Vetero's Due Process and Equal Protection rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment, United States Constitution, by denying him leave to proceed in forma pauperis in violation of the Due Process and Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, United States Constitution?

Did the trial judge violate Petitioner Vetero's Due Process and Equal Protection rights under the Alabama Constitution and an opportunity to oppose the Defendant status in violation of Rule 6(d), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure?

Was Judge Gregory O GRIFFIN disqualified and did he err when he refused to recuse himself for his demonstrated racial bigotry?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was the petitioner denied meaningful and effective access to the Alabama courts?

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2019-12-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 15, 2020)

Attorneys

Ronald D. Veteto
Ronald D. Veteto — Petitioner