This case presents two issues. First, did the court of appeals properly affirm the trial court and hold that it did not err in prohibiting the defense from adducing evidence that two prosecution witnesses were criminals, with extensive past and current misbehavior, when Ms. Shufford had no criminal history of any kind? Second, were Counts 2 & 13 in the indictment fatally defective by alleging dates of the supposed conspiracy which were not times that any criminal behavior occurred?

Did the court of appeals properly affirm the trial court's prohibition of the defense from adducing evidence of prosecution witnesses' criminal histories?