No. 19-8467
Juan Petis McLendon v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights dismissal-without-prejudice due-process federal-statute habeas-corpus judicial-procedure mandatory-review speech-trial-act standing statutory-interpretation stricklands-prejudice
Latest Conference:
2020-06-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does a failure to obtain a dismissal without prejudice under the Speedy Trial Act constitute "Strickland prejudice," when the mandatory language of Title 18 U.S.C. §3161-3174 et seq. requires dismissal?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a failure to obtain dismissal without prejudice under the Speech or Debate Act constitute 'STRICKLAND's prejudice' when the mandatory reversal in USCS 2255 act causes dismissal?
Docket Entries
2020-06-08
Petition DENIED. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-05-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-05-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 15, 2020)
2020-03-03
Application (19A959) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until May 8, 2020.
2020-02-21
Application (19A959) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 9, 2020 to May 8, 2020, submitted to Justice Thomas. (The Chief Justice is recused.).
Attorneys
Juan P. McLendon
Juan Petis McLendon — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent