No. 19-8452

William Strickland v. Illinois

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2020-05-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process judicial-review jurisdiction standing statutory-interpretation takings
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

sutont tho dccomplrce
Why The triel court did not
witness" in strction, 1. P.1.3.17, dispitethe existence of
prebible Cduse to indict Doy " Bleck Armstrong dind
Lawetts Smith for this ofeence.?
Ldoth smith ws drrested dnd chirge-bt changed hor sty
2
to testis dganst william stricklund. And wds relesed?
Blict Bamstrong addoitted he wantd do the kilig
Dsiny
3.
11
i
for money. tnd tirned the wepons int the police hor not
being charged ds the primciple in ttis case?
willism Strickdnd, wos fond guilty
ds decomplice dnd
h
Why
hold
decountible for other defendind- whare there is no
defendint arged?
princobole
5.. The jy fond the the sth did not prove wdlim Sricled
wls the one who fired the shot's that kiled the Orchom.?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-04-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 12, 2020)

Attorneys

William Strickland
William Strickland — Petitioner