William Strickland v. Illinois
sutont tho dccomplrce
Why The triel court did not
witness" in strction, 1. P.1.3.17, dispitethe existence of
prebible Cduse to indict Doy " Bleck Armstrong dind
Lawetts Smith for this ofeence.?
Ldoth smith ws drrested dnd chirge-bt changed hor sty
2
to testis dganst william stricklund. And wds relesed?
Blict Bamstrong addoitted he wantd do the kilig
Dsiny
3.
11
i
for money. tnd tirned the wepons int the police hor not
being charged ds the primciple in ttis case?
willism Strickdnd, wos fond guilty
ds decomplice dnd
h
Why
hold
decountible for other defendind- whare there is no
defendint arged?
princobole
5.. The jy fond the the sth did not prove wdlim Sricled
wls the one who fired the shot's that kiled the Orchom.?
Whether the court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims