No. 19-8450

Scott Leslie Carmell v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-05-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process fourteenth-amendment fourth-circuit habeas-corpus procedural-due-process sentencing-procedure standing
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. whether the Court of Appeals forthe Fifth Cireuit erred by denying a certificate of appealability regarding the united States District court issuinga judgment that procedurally forecloses a jurisdictional remedy, detect correction, or determination,in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United states.

2. Whether the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals erred by denying a certificate of appealability when jurisdictionas a fundamental systemic facet of American jurisprudence yielded to a procedural judgment of the denial of relief requested for the lack ofsubject matter jurisdiction, inviolation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

below to dismiss a case violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States when the frame of subjectmatter jurisdiction is laid before the court.

4. Whether there is a demarcation line between a filed bo(b (u) motion, Federal Rules Civil Procedure, anda 28 U.s.c.$ 2254 habeas corpus procceding that the court's crossing thereof results in violating the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the united States.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit erred by denying a certificate of appealability regarding the United States District Court issuing a judgment that procedurally forecloses a jurisdictional remedy, defect correction, or error correction, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2020-06-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-04-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 11, 2020)
2020-02-26
Application (19A949) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until May 2, 2020.
2020-02-20
Application (19A949) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 2, 2020 to May 2, 2020, submitted to Justice Alito.

Attorneys

Scott Carmell
Scott Carmell — Petitioner