WHETHER THE INTEGRITY OF THE COURT REQUIRES ENFORCEMENT OF RULE 3.171(A) FLA. R. CRIMINAL P. WHERE THE STATE HAS KNOWINGLY AND INTENTIONALLY VIOLATED THE TERMS OF PETITIONER'S PLEA AGREEMENT AFTER PETITIONER HAS SERVED HIS SENTENCE AND CANNOT WITHDRAW FROM THE PLEA.

ARE STATE COURTS EXEMPT FROM FOLLOWING FEDERAL COURT DECISIONS IN CASES SUCH AS GIGLIO?

SHOULDN'T IT BE UNIFORMLY MANDATORY THAT ALL PLEA AGREEMENTS BE IN WRITING ONLY INSTEAD OF ORAL SUCH AS IN THIS CASE AT BAR?

Whether the integrity of the court requires enforcement of Rule 3.172(a) Fla. R. Criminal P. where the state has knowingly and intentionally violated the terms of petitioner's plea agreement after petitioner has served his sentence and cannot withdraw from the plea agreement because the state did not keep its end of the plea agreement by prosecuting petitioner after petitioner had already completed his end of the plea agreement