No. 19-8443
George R. Young v. Wanza Jackson-Mitchell, Warden
IFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights due-process equal-protection standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the State have the authority to commence prosecution after the twenty-year statute of limitations has expired when the alleged suspect is not known pursuant to R.C.2901.13(A)(1)?
Did extending the Six-Year statute of limitations that was in effect in 1993 to Twenty-Years violate Due Process under the Ex Post Facto Clause, R.C.2151.421?
Whether an inmate's awareness of a pending indictment and of his right to request trial on the pending charges satisfies the notification requirements of R.C. 2941.401.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant statutory and constitutional provisions
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-04-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 11, 2020)
Attorneys
George R. Young
George R. Young — Petitioner