I. Whether indigent petitioner's "GATEWAY" FACTUAL INNOCENCE" Showing while being Constructively "DENIED appointment of Counsel on" FIRST and "ALL" other appeals "DENYING" statutory RIGHT" to appeal excUSEs state court exhaustion requirement, and if "FEDERAL District and SECOND CIRCUIT "COurts ERRORED" in DENYING" a C.A.) to" REOPEN" With "CASE" Consolidation??

a. If "NoT whether petitioner's extraordinary "ExISTING" circumstances under 28 U.S.C3 aa54 (bXiXB)ii) render ???

3. Whether District Court" EARoRED in DENYING" petitioner's request for an irNBIASE J Chg ad AWRECUSAL dREFUSAL??

4. Whether "ALL" extraordinary" ExISTING" Circumstances RENDER petitioner an pinmen oppropra CouithRELEASendiFINALIT??

5. WhEthEr" SECOND CIRCUIT" COUrt" ERRORED On aNy "RULINGSin DISHONOR" of "TIMELY" binding Contractual" ColoRING oF LAW agreements ???

6. Wheter prior SECOND CIRCUIT panel member judicial IMPROPRIETY" COnSituTe a" VIOLATIONf a8 Subsequent District an' CIRcuIT CouRTs" decisions "VorD"???

7. WhEthEr "EMERGENCY" 28 U.S.C3a106 SUpeRViSory CORRECTIVE ACTION" SHOUId be" ENFORCED" on MERITS" n" THIS CASE" of" MISCARRAGE of" JUSTICE" under "SUPREME" Court exersize "POWER" ???

Whether indigent petitioner's 'gateway factual innocence' showing while being 'constructively' denied appointment of counsel on first and all other appeals denying statutory right to appeal excuses state court exhaustion requirement