No. 19-8434

Audrey Jean Ukkerd v. State Bar of California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2020-05-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: attorney-misconduct civil-rights due-process fraud legal-ethics medical-evaluation professional-responsibility settlement-conference workers-compensation
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Why did Attorney Michael Siegel, state that, "The State Bar of California states that, in your complaint
. (Audrey J. Ukkerd), you assert that you hired G. Stephano on or around January 1, 2010, to represent you
a Workers' Compensation matter?" You allege that G. Sam Stephano was affiliated with the Law Offices of
Penney & Associates when you initially hired him and began working the Law Offices of Michael Siegel
sometime in 2016?

2. Why didin't G. Sam Stephano share with Attoreny Siegel that he was employed with Penney's &
Associates?

3. Why was my case prolonged after the Attorney Agreed upon QME Richard S. Lieberman, MD Psychiatry
was Invalid Dated 2017?

4. Why didin't G. Sam Stephano schedule a Mandatory Settlement Conference?

5. Why did I have to file the Declarations fo Readiness Mandatory Settlement Conference and the Status
Conference Dated 12/20/2018 and 06/20/2019?

6. Why didn't G. Sam Stephano supervise the adversarials from manufacturing my signature on the Order
Approving Compromised and Release Settlement Papers Dated 06/20/2019?

7. Why was the Status Conference conducted by G. Sam Stephano without the Judge, Attorney Michael
J.Siegel, and Members of te Workers' Compensation Appeals Board?

8. Why was the QME Lieberman, MD Psychiatry requested by G. Sam Stephano after Janak Mehtani, MD
Ranked my Mental Health condition Total Disability 01/04/2010?

9. Did G. Sam Stephano know that Janak Mehtani, MD: Medical Dorector; Diplomate, American Board of
Psychiatry and Neurology, Distinguised Fellow American Psychiatry?

10. Why would I sign Compromise and ReleaseSettlement Papers that stated that I have to pay for my
Menatl Health Hospital Services?

11. Why didi G. Sam Stephano answer my Lgal qustions with untruths, false representation, false narrative

12. How can this Fraudulent Unethical Case against Michael J. Siegel and G. Sam Stephano are Binding ir
the Court of Law?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why did Attorney Michael Siegel state that the State Bar of California asserted certain claims in the complaint?

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-04-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 11, 2020)

Attorneys

Audrey Jean Ukkerd
Audrey Jean Ukkerd — Petitioner