QUESTION ONE:
IF THE RECORD IS VOID OF MARC TRACE WYATT BEING LEGALLY
APPOINTED COUNSEL, DID THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ERR IN DETERMINING
THAT HIS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ARTICLE 15.17 HEARING
WAS THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL?

QUESTION TWO:
WAS THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SELF_REPRESENTATION BY MARC
TRACE WYATT VIOLATED BY THE DISTRICT COURT IN DENYING HIS
REQUEST TO DO SO WITHOUT FIRST HOLDING A HEARING TO DETERMINE
IF HE WAS ABLE TO DO SO?

QUESTION THREE:
WAS THE CONVICTION OF MARC TRACE WYATT OBTAINED ILLEGALLY
BY ALLOWING THE DISTRICT COURT TO USE REPLACEMENT COST WHEN
THE STATE ADMITS IT DID NOT ASCERTAIN THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF
THE DESTROYED PROPERTY?

Was the appointment of counsel valid?